YES 12.863
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((min :: Float -> Float -> Float) :: Float -> Float -> Float) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((min :: Float -> Float -> Float) :: Float -> Float -> Float) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
min1 | x y True | = x |
min1 | x y False | = min0 x y otherwise |
min2 | x y | = min1 x y (x <= y) |
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (min :: Float -> Float -> Float) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primPlusNat(Succ(vx4500), Succ(vx40000)) → new_primPlusNat(vx4500, vx40000)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primPlusNat(Succ(vx4500), Succ(vx40000)) → new_primPlusNat(vx4500, vx40000)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMulNat(Succ(vx30000), vx4000) → new_primMulNat(vx30000, vx4000)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMulNat(Succ(vx30000), vx4000) → new_primMulNat(vx30000, vx4000)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMulNat0(Succ(vx2100), Succ(vx2300)) → new_primMulNat0(vx2100, Succ(vx2300))
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMulNat0(Succ(vx2100), Succ(vx2300)) → new_primMulNat0(vx2100, Succ(vx2300))
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_not(Succ(vx37900), Succ(vx40800)) → new_not(vx37900, vx40800)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_not(Succ(vx37900), Succ(vx40800)) → new_not(vx37900, vx40800)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2